Europan send us a small interview that we find interesting to share.
How did you form the team for the competition?
|GRX Team for Europan 13: Álvaro Gor, Jose Luis Concha, Carlos Gor, Agustín Gor, José María Díaz, Pablo Fdz. Carpintero and Álvaro Gutierrez|
How did you form the team for the competition?
At the time of organising the competition, we tried to put up a team of architects with different profiles that would face the Europan project from the complexity it requires: From a sociological and context vision, to the visual, space and project development.
How do you define the main issue of your project, and how did you answer on this session main topic: Adaptability through Self-Organization, Sharing and/or Project (Process)?
The Barcelona project raised some interesting questions to answer: In one hand, an indefinite context of action, within a change process from an industrial environment towards a residential and commercial environment, as a link between the Port of Barcelona, Montjuic Hill and the Prat of Llobregat. On the other hand the socioeconomic context, with political changes at a government and local level seeking for solutions to the housing problems caused by the financial and mortgage crisis. These questions made us present a project that applies new participative techniques applied to housing that would allow flexible accumulations in its design and construction as well as participative construction spaces for the community. The solution for this maintained a materiality close to the industrial landscapes of the surroundings.
|Europan 13 in Barcelona Bioenergy diagram (GRX)|
How did this issue and the questions raised by the site mutation meet?
The housing Project Works as an energy collector of the environment. Through techniques of water recycling, geothermal and urban gardens, the project is harmonious to the recycling systems of the surroundings. The project presents an environment in which the design is marked up by a social cohesion space, urban gardens, water sheet in sewage, recycling water irrigation and energetic absorption fittings. Nevertheless these techniques for the city are understood only like a support to ease citizens when developing collective practices, as the experience shows that we can’t pre-design from the architectural project.
|South View (GRX)|
|Roof View (GRX)|
Today –at the era of economic crisis and sustainability– the urban-architectural project should reconsider its production method in time; how did you integrate this issue in your project?
Absolutely, and as it is not the only factor to reconsider regarding the architecture, it is one of the most important factors when putting up new transformations in the city. The versatility in time would allow more flexible investments from our promoters and a higher degree of participation coming from the inhabitants. Our project presents a basic structure that can get clogged with housing depending on the demand. These units could be designed by different architects, answering the demands of its inhabitants in a more personalised way. While these houses are not being occupied they would take part of free spaces inside the building, as expansion places for the neighbours.
It is the same for the deck, parcelled for urban gardens for the inhabitants that could be cultivated by the neighbours or associations or collective, building exchange spaces.
|Barcelona´s Sea Port|
Have you treated this issue previously? What were the reference projects that inspired yours?
The questions raised in this project are a constant worry in our office and have been reflected in previous projects, such as Viviendas entre Choperas (Housing in Poplar Orchards), an investigation project on the urban limits in Granada, the Equipamientos Deportivos (Sport equipments) de Gramalote (Colombia), a landscape management project, or Casa en el Camino (House on the road), a single-family house project which is under construction.
|Housing in Poplar Orchards (GRX)|
|Sports Equipments in Gramalote, Colombia (GRX)|
We could consider as a reference for this project the way of understanding the sustainability of the French office Lacaton&Vassal and the way to face the relationship of the collective subconscious and the architecture of the Croatians Njiric&Njiric, although maybe it is more important to us the processes of social change that Barcelona has experienced over the last years.
|Industrial architecture (Abalos&Herreros) and Social Housing (Locaton&Vassal)|
Is it the first time you have been awarded a prize at Europan? How could this help you in your professional career?
Yes, it´s the first time. Some members of the team presented a project for Europan 12 without luck. It was a very interesting project about the adaptation of the architecture to the growing up of the sea level in the next years. A lot of really good projects hasn´t recognition in every competition, it should make us to think.
Europan is a prestigious competition amongst young architects, which will allow us to meet other colleagues with similar concerns to ours backing up our proposals for the society. Nevertheless we believe Europan could be more than an award, turning into a way to face a project. If Europan was not a “winners” project but a platform for young people to put their ideas in common in transformation contexts, making work teams for different studies. This way the strength of the projects before institutions and local councils that undertake such projects would be higher.
|Non awared project in Europan 13 Bergen (GRX)|
|Non awared project in Europan 12 Kalmar (GRX)|